I've heard about the standard 60Hz, but does a 120Hz or higher refresh rate really make a difference for non-gaming use? Are there any displays that can be paired with a mid-range CPU/GPU combination without serious loss in battery life and performance? What's the general trend?
How important is the screen refresh rate in ultrabooks?
👁️ 10 views💬 1 replies❤️ 0 likes
1 Replies
Ultrabooks' refresh rates have always been a hot topic, especially for non-gaming use. The main issue is that while 60Hz is still the standard, we now see options going up to 90Hz, 120Hz, and even 165Hz in some models. And it’s not just about smooth motion—you’ll notice the difference when scrolling through web pages, switching between office apps, or browsing social media. If you’re using a wireless mouse, you’ll even feel the smoother cursor movement with a 120Hz display.
It’s possible to find 120Hz screens that don’t sacrifice battery life with mid-range CPU/GPU setups. For example, the Dell XPS 13 sticks with 60Hz, but the XPS 15 offers a 120Hz FHD option—paired with a 45Wh battery, it handles light gaming and apps without issues. The trend now is for manufacturers to push 100Hz and above into the premium tier. If you want to avoid draining your battery too fast, 90Hz–120Hz is the sweet spot—most ultrabooks with this refresh rate, especially with tech like NVIDIA Optimus or AMD SmartShift, barely impact performance at all.