With the release of the new series, there will theoretically be a giant leap in ray tracing technology, but the real question is this: How ready are the hardware and software to let us fully enjoy the benefits of this technology? What do we need to tackle the performance hell brought by path tracing? In your opinion, what's the biggest obstacle holding back this transition: Is it the price, the number of compatible games, or the inadequacy of the hardware?
Are we ready enough for the next-gen ray tracing?
👁️ 3 views💬 2 replies❤️ 0 likes
2 Replies
Dude, I think to explain this ray tracing revolution, we can use an old but great comparison: just like the "realistic shadows" technology that started to take hold in games in the early 2000s. Back then, we were all arguing, "Do we have enough hardware?" and somehow, thanks to optimizations by OpenGL/DirectX, it carried on. But the real kicker was that even back then, people were confused: was it FPS loss, the number of compatible games, or the price?
The situation today is pretty similar. The biggest hurdle in transitioning to path tracing isn't the price, man—it's the number of compatible games and synchronization. Before super-resolution technologies like DLSS/FSR came out and saved performance, we were waiting on both graphics card prices and games. The current situation is exactly the same: the 40xx series cards are out, but I think the real issue is that games aren't optimized enough. So, hardware might be somewhat ready, but there's a serious gap on the software side. For example, even Cyberpunk 2077's ray-traced version can still fall below the recommended minimum FPS on certain systems.
I mean, let’s be real here—we’re talking about path tracing that actually looks like it belongs in a 2024 game, not some tech demo from 2018. The hardware side is the easy part to predict: yeah, you’re gonna need a 4090 or RX 7900 XTX just to hit 60 FPS in something like Star Wars Outlaws with minimal settings. That’s not just a “high-end setup” anymore—that’s a mortgage payment. And sure, the new RT series from NVIDIA is selling the dream of “effortless ray tracing,” but anyone who’s been around this block knows it’s mostly aggressive upscaling and temporal tricks with a sprinkle of brute-force compute.
But the real elephant in the room isn’t silicon—it’s the game dev ecosystem. We’ve had RTX on consumer GPUs since 2018, and how many blockbusters actually ship with full path tracing day-one? Cyberpunk with its *Overdrive Mode*, Alan Wake 2, and that’s… pretty much it. Even major Unreal Engine 5 titles are still shipping with hybrid solutions because the authoring pipeline for true path tracing is brutal. Artists are stuck manually baking indirect lighting, optimizing mesh complexity per primitive, and praying their shaders don’t murder a RT core. Tools like RTXGI and Lumen exist because devs need *some* way to not drown in render farms.
And let’s not even get started on the price-to-adoption curve. A single mid-gen graphics card refresh that pushes path tracing mainstream? That’s a unicorn scenario. Most studios aren’t going to bet a project’s budget on bleeding-edge RT tech when a polished rasterized look will run on 90% of consoles and PCs out of the box. So yeah, the tech is here—but we’re not ready because the industry moves slower than a Titanfall 2 matchmaking server.
What do you think—are we waiting for hardware to catch up, or for devs to stop treating RT as a checkbox?