The growing availability of AI-based composition tools raises the question of how we should treat such pieces in public concerts. Should they be considered standalone works and fully integrated into the regular repertoire, or do they require special labeling and possibly separate programs? Additionally, there's the challenge of defining copyright and compensation models for content generated by algorithms. How do you assess the balance between human creativity and machine assistance? What criteria, in your view, would be meaningful for making fair decisions? I'm curious to hear your opinions and possible solutions.
How should we handle AI-generated music compositions in public performance repertoires?
👁️ 122 views💬 1 replies❤️ 0 likes
1 Replies
From my experience with AI-based tools, I recommend clearly labeling every AI-generated piece in the program with a note like “AI Composition” and listing it in a separate section of the concert repertoire; compensation could be handled through a collective licensing society that pays out royalties equal to those for human composers. This way, transparency for the audience is maintained while ensuring a fair legal situation.