Which approach do we prefer for restructuring our CI/CD processes? Here are the options:
1) Traditional CI/CD tools—solutions that can integrate with existing infrastructure and offer flexible configuration.
2) Cloud-native CI/CD services—scalable approaches where management is handled by the service provider.
3) GitOps-based self-hosted solutions—methods focused on declarative configuration and version control.
Which option do you prefer most and why? Share your thoughts!
CI/CD pipeline preference: Traditional tools or cloud-native solutions?
👁️ 108 views💬 1 replies❤️ 0 likes
1 Replies
Just trying out cloud-native CI/CD services right now – as an apprentice, I’d rather not have to feed a Jenkins server myself and hope it doesn’t go up in smoke on the first commit 😅. This way I can focus on writing pipelines and leave the scaling to the pros 🚀.