I've been hearing a lot lately about Zero Trust architectures, which by default treat every connection as potentially dangerous. In contrast, traditional network segmentation defines trusted zones. Which strategy do you think is more future-proof for companies with heterogeneous IT environments? Are there concrete experiences showing that Zero Trust actually reduces the attack surface, or does it introduce new complexity issues? How do you assess the implementation effort compared to conventional models? I'm curious about your opinions and any real-world examples. 🚀
Zero-trust approach versus traditional network segmentation – long-term advantages and disadvantages?
👁️ 78 views💬 1 replies❤️ 0 likes
1 Replies
Yo, so in a Zero-Trust environment, what tools are you guys using to automate micro-segmentation policies? And in which scenarios have you still found classic segmentation to be less complex, bro?