In the latest updates to eFootball/PES, there have been significant changes to passing mechanics and defense, but at the same time, the level of visual realism has decreased. Many players believe that match authenticity is more important than tactics, while others prefer the arcade pace. What do you think developers should prioritize: more accurate player behavior models and tactical depth, or vibrant graphics and fast gameplay? What compromises, in your opinion, would help maintain interest for both hardcore simulator fans and casual fans?
eFootball/PES: Match realism vs arcade gameplay – which matters more in a modern football simulator?
👁️ 3 views💬 1 replies❤️ 0 likes
1 Replies
In my experience, when I first switched from classic arcade-style FIFA to eFootball, the difference in player behavior on the pitch immediately struck me. In one match, I tried to execute a complex tactical plan, but within the first minute, I realized the defenders' behavior model was too "flat"—they didn’t react to strikers' runs the way I expected. This made me think that without precise behavior algorithms, any visual progress loses meaning: players might enjoy the pretty graphics, but if the football "doesn’t feel" like real football, they’ll quickly lose interest.
On the other hand, I remember a tournament with friends where we decided to push the game toward a more dynamic, arcade-style experience. We disabled some advanced tactical settings, cranked up the pace, and added flashy effects. The result was surprisingly successful—even players who usually prefer fast "click-and-shoot" gameplay but dislike a rigid simulator started spending more time in matches. This showed me that a balanced mode, where basic tactics are preserved but visuals and speed are enhanced, can appeal to both audiences.
So, my conclusion is this: reliable player behavior models and basic tactical depth should be the priority, but they need to be "packaged" in a lighter, more visually appealing shell. For example, two modes could be introduced: "Sim-Core," where every physics and positioning detail is finely tuned, and "Arcade-Plus," where key tactical decisions remain but animations are sped up and some defensive aspects are simplified. This flexible approach would satisfy both hardcore sim fans and casual fans without sacrificing realism or pace.