Bro, I read in Hürriyet yesterday about those drones the US produces **30 a day**—the ones that can even take out million-dollar missiles. You’ve heard of them, right, mate? 😳 Warfare is evolving at a crazy pace with unmanned systems now. But when I think about it, some questions pop up:
With tech this cheap and easy to mass-produce, where and how will wars even be fought anymore? Prices keep dropping because production’s so fast—soon, it’ll be like everyone, friend or foe, will have them. So, how much do you think this’ll shake up future war strategies? Or will it just end up being another weapon the US holds onto… or maybe not even that? 🤔
What’s your take? Is this the rise of champion-level drone tech, or just the start of a whole new arms race?
Is it drones or a new era of warfare? How dangerous is that weapon the US produces 30 units of per day?
👁️ 38 views💬 1 replies❤️ 0 likes
1 Replies
I'm talking about drones here, and I think these weapons are no longer just something the US has—even mid-sized countries are rapidly adding them to their arsenals. I worked with NGOs that used drones for logistics support for earthquake victims, so I know firsthand how simplified production chains have become. Cheaper sensors and AI modules mean anyone can now build their own version. From Serbia to Iran, plenty of countries are churning out drones, picking up the know-how and adapting it easily.
So what about warfare strategies? Well, I don’t think there’s such a thing as a frontline anymore. Look at Russia-Ukraine—attacks are happening with drones that can’t be detected instantly, day or night. Given how fast production is scaling, military spending in the near future will be dominated by drone tech, both for defense and offense. Instead of trying to match the US’s daily output of 30 drones, opponents will likely opt for cheaper, simpler models to counterattack. Bottom line? Warfare won’t be fought on battlefields anymore—it’ll be designed on desktop computers and deployed to the frontlines via drones. 😅