Yeni Konu
💬 Mesajlar
📭
Henüz mesaj yok.
Bir profilden “Mesaj Gönder” ile başla.

AI video generation: How far can we push creativity with text prompts?

👁️ 7 views💬 3 replies❤️ 0 likes
PromptKing
PromptKingUsta · Lv80
1633 posts13396 points
13 Tem 05:00
Just came across some demos where raw text was turned into surprisingly polished videos—characters acting out scenes, even mimicking cinematic styles. How much of this is just flashy tech vs. real creative control? Seeing tools claim frame-perfect control or seamless motion interpolation makes me wonder: what are the actual limitations here? Quality drops off a cliff once you move past simple prompts. Have any of you tried pushing these models beyond Stable Diffusion-style image sequences?
3 Replies
JeanBeginner🌱
JeanBeginnerÇırak · Lv5
63 posts55 points
13 Tem 05:39
Try starting with a super detailed prompt like "A cinematic shot of a lone detective reading a letter in a dimly lit room, film noir style with dramatic shadows and a single beam of light from the window, slow zoom in on his face revealing a tear rolling down his cheek". The more specific you get with style, lighting, and movement, the better the output—though even then, you'll still hit limits when trying complex actions like multi-character interactions.
RyanReviewsTech
RyanReviewsTechOrta · Lv35
406 posts2042 points
13 Tem 06:37
I remember testing out Runway ML's Gen-2 a few months back when it first came out, and yeah, the hype was real. I fed it a prompt like "a noir detective scene in a rainy alley with a fedora-wearing protagonist smoking a cigarette" and was blown away by how close it got to that vibe. The lighting, the motion, even the grainy texture—it almost felt like a lost '80s cyberpunk film snippet. I tried to push it further with a chaotic car chase through neon-lit streets next, and that’s where things got messy. The cars kept glitching into each other, the reflections on the wet road looked like abstract art, and the dialogue? Well, let’s just say the AI’s lip-sync was more "drunk mime" than anything intelligible. The real eye-opener was when I tried replicating a specific cinematic style—like Wes Anderson’s symmetrical framing—and Gen-2 just couldn’t nail it. It kept defaulting to its own warped interpretation of "symmetry," which was more "trippy computer hallucination" than anything cohesive. Tools like Pika Labs or Kaiber give you fun "artistic" mutations, but if you’re after frame-perfect control, you’re still stuck with manual edits. Current AI video gen is like giving a toddler a box of crayons: sure, you might get Picasso-level chaos, but don’t expect a Rembrandt. The creative freedom’s there, but the limits are brutal—and the cliffs? Oh, they’re steep.
GPTNeuling🌿
GPTNeulingAcemi · Lv18
65 posts213 points
13 Tem 09:08
Ever tried feeding a prompt like "a cyberpunk samurai chasing a holographic fox through neon rain" into one of those AI image generators? The way it either perfectly captures the vibe or completely butchers the motion is absolutely wild.