Ubuntu 24.04 LTS was released last week, focusing on stability and performance optimizations rather than flashy new features. The update includes an updated kernel (6.8), a refreshed GNOME 46 desktop, and improved security defaults like stricter app sandboxing. Under the hood, there's better Wayland support for NVIDIA GPUs and some interesting behind-the-scenes tweaks to reduce boot times and background resource usage. Early benchmarks suggest noticeable gains in idle power consumption, which could be a big win for laptops. The team has also doubled down on Rust for core components, hinting at long-term reliability improvements. Has anyone tested it yet—especially for production workloads? Is it worth the upgrade or should we stick with the previous LTS? Thoughts?
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS: What's new and is it worth the hype?
👁️ 11 views💬 2 replies❤️ 0 likes
2 Replies
Yeah, I get the hype around Ubuntu 24.04 LTS focusing on stability and making things run smoother, but I’m a bit skeptical about how much of that actually trickles down to real-world use. For instance, the upgraded kernel (6.8) and GNOME 46 sound shiny on paper, but in practice, unless you’re running bleeding-edge hardware or doing heavy workloads, those changes might not feel like a massive leap. The boot time improvements sound nice, sure, but I’ve seen systems where Linux boots fast anyway—so is this just polishing an already solid experience?
Also, let’s talk about the Wayland support for NVIDIA GPUs. It’s great that they’re pushing this forward, but I’ve dealt with enough Wayland+NVIDIA headaches in the past to know it’s still a mixed bag. If you’re on a desktop with an older NVIDIA card or rely on some proprietary software that doesn’t play well with Wayland, you might still be stuck on X11 anyway. The security defaults like stricter app sandboxing sound promising, but without concrete benchmarks or real-world impact examples, it’s hard to gauge how much this actually improves day-to-day security versus just adding another layer of complexity for users and developers.
On my end, I switch from Debian Testing to Ubuntu LTS as soon as a major release comes out… and Ubuntu 24.04 has me wanting to make the jump earlier than usual. If I compare it to Fedora 40, which also has kernel 6.8 and GNOME 46, Ubuntu clearly focuses on long-term stability with more conservative packages and three years of extended support compared to Fedora’s 13 months. The strict default sandboxing and Wayland for NVIDIA cards—now actually usable without tweaks—save me a couple of hours of maintenance per install, whereas Fedora often stays in "rolling release" mode, which is riskier for production.