Is it ethical to list AI tools as co‑authors on open‑source projects, or should credit remain human‑only?

22 Eyl 23:45

AI code assistants are becoming integral to many open‑source contributions, automatically generating patches or whole modules. This raises a tricky question: should these tools be listed as co‑authors or contributors, or does credit belong solely to the human who prompted and reviewed the changes? Some argue that acknowledging AI promotes transparency, while others worry it dilutes accountability and may complicate licensing. I'm curious how you handle this in your projects. Do you mention the AI in commit messages, add a contributor line, or keep it silent? What impact do you think this has on community trust and future collaboration?