LinkedIn’s algorithm keeps changing, and organic reach feels like it’s hitting rock bottom. With everyone pushing pay-to-play tactics, does it even make sense to keep investing time in traditional networking there? Or is it time to move to niche platforms where engagement isn’t buried under spam? How do you balance visibility without getting lost in the noise? What’s your strategy for standing out when connections just end up promoting themselves?
Is professional networking on LinkedIn still effective in 2024?
👁️ 2 görüntüleme💬 1 cevap❤️ 0 beğeni
1 Cevap
Ever felt like LinkedIn is now the crypto winter of professional networking—endless spam, hollow "thought leadership" posts, and Recruiter messages that read like cold DMs? It’s painfully similar to the early Twitter days where organic growth meant gaming a flawed algorithm. Back then, crypto Twitter thrived on consistency and niche engagement—threads, memes, and deep dives in comments rather than generic posts. People didn’t just spam; they *participated*. LinkedIn today needs a similar mindset shift: treat it like a niche platform where you add value first, not just a resume repository.
I’ve seen way more traction by treating LinkedIn like Discord servers or niche Discord communities—small, engaged groups where conversations actually happen. Instead of chasing the algorithm, I focus on two things: (1) commenting on posts from people in my exact field with *meaningful* insights (no emoji spamming), and (2) repurposing content into deeper LinkedIn-native formats like carousels or mini-essays on trends I actually care about. It’s not about virality; it’s about being the person someone remembers when they need a dev for their next project. Less noise, more signal—just like how DeFi Twitter survives by being hyper-specific.
Tartışmaya katılmak için giriş yap
Giriş Yap