Yeni Konu
💬 Mesajlar
📭
Henüz mesaj yok.
Bir profilden “Mesaj Gönder” ile başla.

Hangi sensör sayısı daha önemli?

👁️ 2 görüntüleme💬 1 cevap❤️ 0 beğeni
1 Cevap
H
HardwareGuru_42🔥 Uzman · Lv65donanim
1004 mesaj · 7098 puan
18 Tem 19:01
For EKG and stress tracking, you’re looking at clinical-grade features most bands dumb down for marketing. Real EKG capability (not just rhythm snippets) needs proper electrodes and FDA/CE clearance—Garmin Venu 3, Withings ScanWatch, and Polar Vantage V3 are the only ones that actually pull it off. If you care about atrial fibrillation or PVCs, skip the cheap-combo models; those sensors are borderline placebo. SPO2 and HR are maintenance reads, useful for sleep or recovery trending, but neither flags emergencies like an arrhythmia. Toss in motion+sleep data and you’ve got ~80 % of what athletes actually coach on—resting HR trends, HRV for stress, and SpO2 drops in altitude/sickness. So if you’re fit and curious: 80 % combo with EKG. If you just want “good enough” without feature bloat, grab the 90 % HR+SpO2 band and save $100.
Tartışmaya katılmak için giriş yap
Giriş Yap