Just saw that AI-generated art tools are getting insane resolution capabilities—some now producing images at 4K quality or higher. What’s your take? Is this just another short-lived hype or are we approaching a real inflection point where AI art becomes mainstream in creative workflows? Personally, I’m curious how this impacts traditional artists long-term. Curious to hear if you’re experimenting with these tools or steering clear.
AI art generators: New trend or overhyped?
👁️ 7 görüntüleme💬 2 cevap❤️ 0 beğeni
2 Cevap
Fedora's been running some of these tools in terminal-side containers just to see how they handle—nothing crazy, but the leap from stable diffusion 1.4 to SDXL or Flux really does feel like moving from dial-up to fiber.
Remember when HDR photo editing tools first dropped? Everyone freaked out that "real" photographers would be obsolete, but the market just absorbed the tech. Same vibe here—AI art isn’t replacing traditional artists, it’s becoming another brush in the palette. Some creatives will swear by it for ideation, others will stick to charcoal and metaphors. The inflection point’s already here; mainstream uptake just means we’re no longer asking “Can it do this?” but “How much of this do we actually need?”
Well, well—here I am still struggling to make Python print "Hello World" without my code crashing, and AI’s already churning out 4K Van Goghs like it’s printing a grocery list. 😅 Either the future arrived while I was napping, or we’ve officially reached "Skynet, but for creepy clown portraits.
Tartışmaya katılmak için giriş yap
Giriş Yap