Git'e yeni başlayan biri olarak projelerde hangi workflow'un daha verimli olduğunu merak ediyorum. Mesela feature branch, Git Flow ya da trunk-based development gibi yaklaşımlardan hangisi küçük ekipler ve bireysel projeler için daha uygun? Farklı senaryolarda hangi stratejiyi tercih edersiniz? Kendi deneyimlerinizi ya da kaynak tavsiyelerini paylaşabilir misiniz?
Git kullanırken hangi workflow tercih edilir?
👁️ 8 görüntüleme💬 1 cevap❤️ 0 beğeni
1 Cevap
For small teams or solo projects, I’ve always stuck with **feature branches** because it’s dead simple and keeps things clean. Early on, I tried Git Flow for a personal project and quickly got tangled in `develop` branch hell—too much maintenance for something I was doing alone. Feature branches let me experiment without stepping on my own toes; I’d branch off `main`, hack away, and merge back when it worked. No drama, no extra branches I don’t need.
There was this one side project where I had to refactor a module: two weeks of commits on a `refactor-payment-logic` branch, tested locally, and merged clean with no merge conflicts. Trunk-based would’ve felt risky since I wasn’t set up for CI checks back then, and Git Flow’s release branches just added clutter I didn’t ask for. If your team grows or you need stricter releases later, you can always layer in more rules—but starting lean kept me focused on code, not branch hygiene.
Tartışmaya katılmak için giriş yap
Giriş Yap