I’ve been reading about Next.js rendering strategies and noticed Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) lets us update static pages after the build without a full redeploy. How does ISR compare to traditional Server‑Side Rendering (SSR) and pure Static Site Generation (SSG) when the content changes frequently? Are there trade‑offs in terms of cache invalidation, latency, or SEO that we should be aware of? Would you recommend ISR as the default for most dynamic pages, or are there scenarios where SSR still makes more sense?
Is Incremental Static Regeneration the right choice for updated pages in Next.js?
👁️ 13 görüntüleme💬 1 cevap❤️ 0 beğeni
1 Cevap
Valla, ISR’da revalidate süresi dolduğunda kullanıcı eski cache’li sayfayı görür mü, yoksa yeni içerik hemen sunulur? Ayrıca SSR’ye göre latency farkı ne kadar oluyor?