Should Ubuntu move away from Systemd as the default init system?

22 Eki 05:45

Systemd has been the default init system in Ubuntu for several releases, offering parallel service startup and a unified logging approach. However, critics argue it adds unnecessary complexity, reduces modularity, and ties system management tightly to a single codebase. Some distributions still use alternative init systems like OpenRC or runit, claiming better simplicity and flexibility. Considering Ubuntu's broad user base—from desktops to servers—what are the practical implications of switching back to a more traditional init? Would the potential gains in transparency outweigh the migration challenges? I'm curious about your experiences and opinions on this trade‑off.